Saturday, February 19, 2005

Torture

by Wislawa Szymborska

Nothing has changed.
The body is susceptible to pain,
it must eat and breathe air and sleep,
it has thin skin and blood right underneath,
an adequate stock of teeth and nails,
its bones are breakable, its joints are stretchable.
In tortures all this is taken into account.

Nothing has changed.
The body shudders as it shuddered
before the founding of Rome and after,
in the twentieth century before and after Christ.
Tortures are as they were, it's just the earth that's grown smaller,
and whatever happens seems right on the other side of the wall.

Nothing has changed. It's just that there are more people,
besides the old offenses new ones have appeared,
real, imaginary, temporary, and none,
but the howl with which the body responds to them,
was, is and ever will be a howl of innocence
according to the time-honored scale and tonality.


Nothing has changed. Maybe just the manners, ceremonies, dances.
Yet the movement of the hands in protecting the head is the same.
The body writhes, jerks and tries to pull away,
its legs give out, it falls, the knees fly up,
it turns blue, swells, salivates and bleeds.

Nothing has changed. Except for the course of boundaries,
the line of forests, coasts, deserts and glaciers.
Amid these landscapes traipses the soul,
disappears, comes back, draws nearer, moves away,
alien to itself, elusive, at times certain, at others uncertain of its own existence,
while the body is and is and is
and has no place of its own.

Sunday, February 13, 2005

Look on These Ruins, Ye Mightly, and Ponder Your Fate

*****

BOOKS OF THE TIMES; Look on These Ruins, Ye Mighty, and Ponder Your Fate

By MICHIKO KAKUTANI
Published: January 11, 2005, Tuesday

'Collapse'
'How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed'
By Jared Diamond
Illustrated. 575 pages. Viking. $29.95.

Jared Diamond's fascinating but not always convincing new book, ''Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed,'' tries hard to live up to its apocalyptic title.

It begins with the stories of several historical collapses, including the demise of the Easter Islanders, remembered now for the iconic stone heads they left behind on their Pacific island home; the fall of the ancient Mayan cities that were once the hub of the New World's most advanced Native American civilization; and the disappearance of the Norse colony on Greenland after surviving for 450 years as Europe's most remote outpost. In all these cases, Mr. Diamond diagnoses a similar pattern of catastrophe: environmental damage (usually deforestation leading to soil erosion, food shortages and eventually social and political crises), worsened by other factors like climate change, shifting trade patterns and shortsighted or venal leadership.

From these dire historical tales, Mr. Diamond -- the author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning best seller ''Guns, Germs and Steel'' -- quickly fast-forwards, suggesting that these ancient examples may hold a lesson for our environmentally challenged world today. He argues that current environmental problems include the same ones that undermined past societies, plus four new ones: ''human-caused climate change, buildup of toxic chemicals in the environment, energy shortages and full human utilization of the earth's photosynthetic capacity.'' Many of these problems, he adds, are expected to ''become globally critical within the next few decades.''

''Much more likely than a doomsday scenario involving human extinction or an apocalyptic collapse of industrial civilization,'' he writes, ''would be 'just' a future of significantly lower living standards, chronically higher risks and the undermining of what we now consider some of our key values. Such a collapse could assume various forms, such as the worldwide spread of diseases or else of wars, triggered ultimately by scarcity of environmental resources.''

Already, he argues, societal collapse has become a palpable specter in some troubled third-world countries. He contends that environmental problems and resulting land and food shortages played a key role in fueling the ethnic slaughter that plagued Rwanda in the 1990's, and that similar environmental destruction has contributed to Haiti's current plight.

With this volume, Mr. Diamond wants very much to write a kind of bookend to ''Guns, Germs and Steel.'' That earlier book attempted to explain why Western civilizations developed the technologies and social and political strategies that enabled them to dominate the world; this volume attempts to explain in a far more haphazard manner why some societies failed to flourish and eventually vanished from the face of the earth.

Mr. Diamond -- who has academic training in physiology, geography and evolutionary biology -- is a lucid writer with an ability to make arcane scientific concepts readily accessible to the lay reader, and his case studies of failed cultures are never less than compelling. He presents some intriguing digressions about methods used by scientists and historians to diagnose the trajectory of long dead societies, and provides some provocative analyses of current environmental problems in Australia, the United States and China.

Noting that China is rapidly progressing toward its goal of achieving a first-world economy, Mr. Diamond writes that if that gigantic nation's per-capita consumption rates do in fact rise to first-world levels, it will result in the approximate doubling of the ''entire world's human resource use and environmental impact.'' Something has to give way, he concludes: ''That is the strongest reason why China's problems automatically become the world's problems.''

Toward the end of ''Collapse,'' Mr. Diamond poses the question of why some societies undermine themselves and even commit suicide by making disastrous decisions. He comes up with four fuzzily defined categories: 1) failure to anticipate a problem (i.e. the British introduction of foxes and rabbits to Australia -- two alien mammals that have cost billions of dollars in damage and control expenditures); 2) failure to perceive a problem that has actually arrived (often because a slow trend like global warming is concealed by wide up and down fluctuations); 3) failure to attempt to solve a problem once it has been identified (usually because leaders put self-interest before the public good or focus on short-term benefits over long-term needs); and 4) failure to find a viable solution to the problem (frequently because of prohibitive costs or because too little has been done too late).

Such discussions are useful in getting the reader to think about the big picture -- about matters like the sustainability of current consumption patterns in a world of shrinking resources, and the role that cultural values can play in a society's welfare. Did the reluctance of the Norse settlers in Greenland to learn survival skills from their Inuit rivals help seal their fate? Did the obsession of Easter Island chiefs with trying to outdo their rivals by building bigger and bigger statues (which consumed precious natural resources and labor) effectively doom their civilization?

Interesting as such questions might be, this book remains, in the end, a messy hodgepodge of case studies, glued together with speculation and questionable analogies. For one thing, Mr. Diamond's selection of failed civilizations from the past seems arbitrary in the extreme: Why Easter Island and not ancient Rome? Why the Anasazi of the American Southwest and not the Minoans of ancient Crete?

In addition, the reader is left wondering if the examples he has selected truly offer useful analogies to the world's current situation. After all, as Mr. Diamond himself points out, there are huge differences between the historical examples he cites and the plight of the world today: most notably, the role that technology plays in accelerating change (speeding up both environmental damage and possible solutions to that damage) and the role of globalization in linking the fates of wildly disparate and distant societies. Although Mr. Diamond talks about these differences, he does so in a highly cursory manner -- more as a pre-emptive strike against possible critics than as part of a carefully considered analysis central to this book.

Published: 01 - 11 - 2005 , Late Edition - Final , Section E , Column 1 , Page 9

Wednesday, February 02, 2005

The push to 'Buy Singapore'

Hard sell of made-in-S'pore products to locals will help brands go international
Wednesday • February 2, 2005
Val Chua val@newstoday.com.sg

IMAGINE going completely patriotic one day — Breakfast at Ya Kun, lunch at Prima Taste and dinner at Crystal Jade, listening to music on your Creative Zen Micro and catching the news on your Akira television set.

The Singapore business community hopes more Singaporeans will do this, that is, choose made-in-Singapore goods and services over foreign imports to boost the fledging entrepreneurial movement.

A "Buy Singapore" campaign is being tossed around and the hope is that the Government will take the lead, said Mr Phillip Overmyer, executive director of the Singapore International Chamber of Commerce.

"When the Japanese were selling automobiles in the US, the Americans countered by saying, 'Buy US cars'. And if you go to Ireland, they'd want you to drink Guinness, not Tiger," he told Today.

A bold, in-your-face campaign — complete with patriotic "made-in-Singapore" stickers in local stores — would send a strong signal that there is more than just empty talk about entrepreneurship.

The rationale: Stimulate market demand for the goods and services of small-and-medium enterprises (SMEs) that would otherwise go unnoticed. The aim: More Creatives to take on the Apples of the world.

"If an SME doesn't have a viable market to get its business up and running in Singapore, it can never go international. If BreadTalk didn't take Singapore by storm, they won't be in Indonesia today," said Mr Overmyer.

This idea of a "Buy Singapore" campaign was mooted yesterday at the pre-Budget dialogue held by the Feedback Unit when the perennial problem of SMEs trying to stay afloat amid foreign giants was highlighted.

The problem is especially felt in the construction sector, but observers say it is also an issue in the retail sector, where unestablished Singapore brands quietly try to grow as shoppers go for flashier imports.

"When you think of Singapore restaurants, you think of Tung Lok and Thai Village. But there are a lot more Chinese restaurants, with Singapore roots, that suffer from a lack of branding and awareness," said Mr Wong Bun Huge, president of the 180-strong Restaurant Association of Singapore and owner of the Dragon City Restaurant.

IE Singapore has been helping Singapore companies break into foreign markets, but observers say it is established brands that are courted, not the unpolished diamonds.

"Similar support and attention should be given to developing brands like Akira," said avid shopper Janet Fong.

Putting a personality behind such campaigns may work, Ms Jannie Tay, who heads the 300-member Singapore Retail Association, told Today.

"In Thailand, PM Thaksin has been actively promoting the fashion industry there. The Malaysian PM's wife wears batik to promote it," she said, adding that since 80 per cent of retail customers are locals, a 'Buy Singapore' campaign makes sense.

"I'm all for it. First, we must promote at home, then we can go regional," said Ms Tay.

The Government should lead by changing its foreign-is-best mentality when awarding construction projects, said engineer Lee Bee Wah at the Feedback Unit session yesterday.

"In the past, a lot of big projects were awarded to big Japanese or Chinese construction firms. Singapore construction companies have since improved, but the system of awarding jobs hasn't changed," she claimed.

Instead of handing a large-scale project to just one main contractor, the Government should sub-divide the project and so create more opportunities for local players, she added.

Similarly, a "Buy Singapore" campaign might see Government-linked companies taking the lead and buying from the smaller boys, said Mr Overmyer.

The two-hour session, conducted annually by the Feedback Unit, was "fruitful", said Dr Wang Kai Yuen, Chairman of the Feedback Supervisory Panel and MP for Bukit Timah.

"In the past, the dialogue centred on specific tax measures," he said. "Today, the challenges are quite different and the discussion revolves around how to promote domestic demand, especially for SMEs. It's about Singaporeans taking ownership of their future."

Copyright MediaCorp Press Ltd. All rights reserved.